GPEAF vs WKPPF: Great Portland Estates Plc vs Workspace Group plc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
GP
GPEAF•United States
$3.71
+0.00%
WK
WKPPF•United States
$5.70
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Great Portland Estates Plc is 2.1× the market cap of Workspace Group plc. WKPPF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $3.71 | $5.70 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 1.92% | -0.70% |
| 52-Week High | $5.23 | $11.37 |
| 52-Week Low | $3.71 | $4.75 |
| Beta | 0.82 | 1.07 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $1.10B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.62B | $1.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114.00M | $182.90M |
| Shares Outstanding | 403.41M | 192.29M |
| Float | 351.63M | 135.49M |
Valuation
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 10.76 | — |
| Price / Sales | 19.96 | 5.99 |
| Price / Book | 0.78 | 0.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 78.78 | 20.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 127.37% | -41.50% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 33.07% | 47.17% |
| Return on Equity | 7.32% | -5.20% |
| Return on Assets | 0.67% | 2.43% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.49 | -0.53 |
Growth
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 24.20% | -2.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 98.30% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 279.00% | 666.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.11 | 0.38 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.96 | 0.10 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.96 | 0.05 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -8.04 | 0.11 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.5007 |
Ownership
| Metric | GPEAF | WKPPF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1.23% | 37.32% |
| % Institutions | 81.78% | 48.05% |
Compare GPEAF to peers
Compare WKPPF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.