FMOCF vs TMRAF: Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA vs Tomra Systems ASA
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in United States.
FM
FMOCF•United States
$10.30
+0.00%
TM
TMRAF•United States
$13.00
+0.12%
Quick Summary
Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA is 1.7× the market cap of Tomra Systems ASA. FMOCF trades at a lower P/E than TMRAF. TMRAF pays a dividend; FMOCF does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $10.30 | $13.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.12% |
| 1-Year Return | 0.00% | -11.28% |
| 52-Week High | $10.30 | $17.29 |
| 52-Week Low | $10.30 | $11.04 |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.44 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.89B | $3.45B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.65B | $4.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.57B | $1.32B |
| Shares Outstanding | 472.95M | 295.40M |
| Float | 72.06M | 202.91M |
Valuation
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 16.82 | 32.42 |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.83 |
| Price / Sales | 0.62 | 2.62 |
| Price / Book | 1.88 | 5.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.33 | 15.61 |
Profitability
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.42% | 7.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.50% | 16.83% |
| Return on Equity | 5.73% | 15.60% |
| Return on Assets | 2.52% | 5.38% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.74 | 0.36 |
Growth
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.30% | -3.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -71.00% | -11.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 193.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.23 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | — | 0.64 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.97 | 0.39 |
| Calmar (Composite) | — | 0.93 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5394 | 0.4562 |
Ownership
| Metric | FMOCF | TMRAF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 88.58% | 0.10% |
| % Institutions | 7.34% | 83.75% |
Compare FMOCF to peers
Compare TMRAF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.