FLS vs IP: FLSmidth & Co. vs INTERPUMP GROUP
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
FLS•Nasdaq Copenhagen
DKK 542.00
+3.83%
IP
IP•MIL
€38.68
+3.53%
Quick Summary
FLSmidth & Co. is 5.5× the market cap of INTERPUMP GROUP. FLS pays a dividend; IP does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | DKK 542.00 | €38.68 |
| Daily Change | 3.83% | 3.53% |
| 1-Year Return | 84.73% | 39.06% |
| 52-Week High | DKK 611.00 | €51.00 |
| 52-Week Low | DKK 291.20 | €27.60 |
| 50-Day MA | DKK 533.07 | — |
| 200-Day MA | DKK 464.02 | — |
| Beta | 1.37 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.57B | $5.20B |
| Enterprise Value | $30.92B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.61B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 54.21M | — |
| Float | 45.87M | — |
| Employees | 5,296 | 9,417 |
Valuation
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 42.92 | — |
| Forward P/E | 20.79 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 2.29 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.96 | — |
| Price / Book | 3.04 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.87 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.00% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.45% | — |
| Return on Equity | 6.71% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.72% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 12.28 | — |
Growth
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.90% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 38.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 4.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 11.18 | 2.62 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.69 | 4.28 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.06 | -0.04 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7523 | 0.6162 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #11,971 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | FLS | IP |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1529.70% | — |
| % Institutions | 3521.70% | — |
Compare FLS to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.