FBASF vs GPTGF: Fibra UNO vs GPT Group
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.

FBASF•United States
$1.80
+0.00%
GP
GPTGF•United States
$3.35
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Fibra UNO and GPT Group are similar in size. GPTGF trades at a lower P/E than FBASF. GPTGF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $1.80 | $3.35 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 52.54% | 19.90% |
| 52-Week High | $1.86 | $3.83 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.23 | $2.64 |
| 50-Day MA | $1.62 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $1.50 | — |
| Beta | 0.22 | 0.93 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.75B | $6.34B |
| Enterprise Value | $13.92B | $12.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.51B | $1.04B |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.81B | 1.92B |
| Float | 3.76B | 1.91B |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.44 | 9.19 |
| Forward P/E | 8.93 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.19 | 6.11 |
| Price / Book | 0.53 | 0.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.92 | 18.78 |
Profitability
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 80.16% | 94.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 64.47% | 61.47% |
| Return on Equity | 12.37% | 9.46% |
| Return on Assets | 3.41% | 2.50% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.16 | 0.36 |
Growth
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.60% | -5.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 237.80% | 1238.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 481.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.17 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 19.63 | 0.53 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 7.00 | 0.31 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 51.13 | 2.25 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,564 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | FBASF | GPTGF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2772.30% | 42.01% |
| % Institutions | 2114.00% | 55.76% |
Compare FBASF to peers
Compare GPTGF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.