FBASF vs GPT: Fibra UNO vs GPT Group
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
FBASF•United States
$1.80
+0.00%
GP
GPT•Australian Securities Exchange
A$4.67
-0.21%
Quick Summary
GPT Group is 1.5× the market cap of Fibra UNO. GPT trades at a lower P/E than FBASF. GPT offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $1.80 | A$4.67 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -0.21% |
| 1-Year Return | 52.54% | 4.47% |
| 52-Week High | $1.86 | A$5.68 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.23 | A$4.43 |
| 50-Day MA | $1.62 | A$4.78 |
| 200-Day MA | $1.50 | A$5.24 |
| Beta | 0.22 | 0.93 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.75B | $8.91B |
| Enterprise Value | $13.92B | $14.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.51B | $1.04B |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.81B | 1.92B |
| Float | 3.76B | 1.91B |
| Employees | 0 | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.44 | 9.12 |
| Forward P/E | 8.93 | 12.99 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Price / Sales | 0.19 | 8.58 |
| Price / Book | 0.53 | 0.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.92 | 11.47 |
Profitability
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 80.16% | 94.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 64.47% | 61.47% |
| Return on Equity | 12.37% | 9.46% |
| Return on Assets | 3.41% | 2.50% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.16 | 0.51 |
Growth
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.60% | -5.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 237.80% | 1255.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 5.22% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.24 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 19.63 | -0.20 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 7.00 | 1.66 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 51.13 | 0.91 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.4928 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,564 | #19,862 |
Ownership
| Metric | FBASF | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2772.30% | 3722.10% |
| % Institutions | 2114.00% | 5600.80% |
Compare FBASF to peers
Compare GPT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.