FBASF vs GMG: Fibra UNO vs Goodman Group
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
FBASF•United States
$1.80
+0.00%
GMG•Australian Securities Exchange
A$29.38
-0.51%
Quick Summary
Goodman Group is 10.1× the market cap of Fibra UNO. FBASF trades at a lower P/E than GMG. GMG offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $1.80 | A$29.38 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -0.51% |
| 1-Year Return | 52.54% | 4.41% |
| 52-Week High | $1.86 | A$36.14 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.23 | A$25.08 |
| 50-Day MA | $1.62 | A$28.03 |
| 200-Day MA | $1.50 | A$31.38 |
| Beta | 0.22 | 0.98 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.75B | $58.15B |
| Enterprise Value | $13.92B | $58.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.51B | $3.10B |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.81B | 2.04B |
| Float | 3.76B | 2.00B |
| Employees | 0 | 1,030 |
Valuation
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.44 | 33.86 |
| Forward P/E | 8.93 | 20.28 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 2.72 |
| Price / Sales | 0.19 | 18.76 |
| Price / Book | 0.53 | 2.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.92 | 32.53 |
Profitability
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 80.16% | 54.55% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 64.47% | 55.90% |
| Return on Equity | 12.37% | 7.93% |
| Return on Assets | 3.41% | 3.87% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.16 | 0.84 |
Growth
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.60% | -15.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 237.80% | -3.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.30 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 41.38 | 6.09 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 15.53 | 7.00 |
| Calmar (Composite) | — | -0.48 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.6044 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,430 | #26,259 |
Ownership
| Metric | FBASF | GMG |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2772.30% | 257.60% |
| % Institutions | 2114.00% | 5015.80% |
Compare FBASF to peers
Compare GMG to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.