EADSF vs ESLT: Airbus Group SE vs ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
EADSF•United States
$212.30
+6.14%
ES
ESLT•TASE
ILA 263,200.00
-0.49%
Quick Summary
Airbus Group SE is 1.5× the market cap of ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD. EADSF pays a dividend; ESLT does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $212.30 | ILA 263,200.00 |
| Daily Change | 6.14% | -0.49% |
| 1-Year Return | 36.97% | 74.87% |
| 52-Week High | $257.05 | ILA 308,000.00 |
| 52-Week Low | $149.78 | ILA 134,599.47 |
| 50-Day MA | $208.87 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $222.79 | — |
| Beta | 0.88 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $157.22B | $102.11B |
| Enterprise Value | $147.47B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73.42B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 787.23M | — |
| Float | 584.15M | — |
| Employees | 165,294 | 20,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 25.91 | — |
| Forward P/E | 23.47 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.48 | — |
| Price / Sales | 2.14 | — |
| Price / Book | 5.16 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.30 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 7.11% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.84% | — |
| Return on Equity | 21.62% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.71% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 7.70 | — |
Growth
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.10% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 6.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.60% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 3.20 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.90 | 3.31 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.74 | 1.54 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 8.90 | 4.13 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5905 | 0.6965 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #18,251 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | EADSF | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2573.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 3757.60% | — |
Compare EADSF to peers
Compare ESLT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.