CWQXY vs GTWCF: Castellum AB ADR vs Greentown China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CW
CWQXY•United States
$26.75
+0.00%
GT
GTWCF•United States
$1.45
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Castellum AB ADR is 1.7× the market cap of Greentown China Holdings Limited. GTWCF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $26.75 | $1.45 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 39.32% | — |
| 52-Week High | $26.75 | $1.45 |
| 52-Week Low | $19.20 | $1.45 |
| 50-Day MA | $25.00 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $23.73 | — |
| Beta | 1.56 | 0.67 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.15B | $3.68B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.01B | $168.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.89B | $142.35B |
| Shares Outstanding | 246.05M | 2.54B |
| Float | 347.44M | 1.02B |
| Employees | 485 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 19.38 | — |
| Forward P/E | 19.92 | — |
| Price / Sales | 6.10 | 0.03 |
| Price / Book | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.18 | 16.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 9.49% | -0.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 0.00% | 8.55% |
| Return on Equity | 1.19% | 1.79% |
| Return on Assets | 2.58% | 1.16% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.50% | -23.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 82.30% | -89.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 288.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.04 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.19 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5570 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #12,251 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CWQXY | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 59.96% |
| % Institutions | 0.00% | 10.70% |
Compare CWQXY to peers
Compare GTWCF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.