CTRYQ vs NNRHF: Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd. vs Neinor Homes S.A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CT
CTRYQ•United States
$0.03
+0.00%
NN
NNRHF•United States
$16.01
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd. and Neinor Homes S.A are similar in size. CTRYQ trades at a lower P/E than NNRHF.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $0.03 | $16.01 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 4471.43% | 25.57% |
| 52-Week High | $0.15 | $16.01 |
| 52-Week Low | $0.00 | $12.75 |
| 50-Day MA | $0.01 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $0.03 | — |
| Beta | 2.68 | 0.21 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $1.58B |
| Enterprise Value | $37.19B | $3.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $223.22B | $704.63M |
| Shares Outstanding | 42.20B | 98.54M |
| Float | 16.23B | 70.59M |
| Employees | 17,920 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 18.40 |
| Forward P/E | 3.80 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.01 | 2.24 |
| Price / Book | 0.16 | 1.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | -0.47 | 41.02 |
Profitability
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -17.50% | 17.49% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -14.81% | 10.28% |
| Return on Equity | -81.11% | 10.87% |
| Return on Assets | -1.01% | 1.61% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.21 | 0.87 |
Growth
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -28.90% | 76.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 0.00% | 129.60% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 11.70 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 10.59 | 1.14 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 25.00 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5047 | 0.5298 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CTRYQ | NNRHF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4113.90% | 29.00% |
| % Institutions | 519.90% | 65.16% |
Compare CTRYQ to peers
Compare NNRHF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.