CRBJF vs SOBHA: China Resources Land Ltd vs Sobha Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CR
CRBJF•United States
$3.80
+0.00%

SOBHA•NSE
₹1,332.20
+0.83%
Quick Summary
Sobha Limited is 5.0× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than SOBHA. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $3.80 | ₹1,332.20 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.83% |
| 52-Week High | $3.98 | ₹1,701.20 |
| 52-Week Low | $3.80 | ₹1,156.80 |
| 50-Day MA | — | ₹1,351.36 |
| 200-Day MA | — | ₹1,480.91 |
| Beta | — | 0.23 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.38B | $142.50B |
| Enterprise Value | $374.32B | $125.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $281.44B | $44.43B |
| Shares Outstanding | 7.13B | 106.93M |
| Float | 2.89B | 44.51M |
| Employees | — | 4,483 |
Valuation
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 7.37 | 99.87 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.29 |
| Price / Sales | 0.10 | 3.21 |
| Price / Book | 0.68 | 3.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.09 | 29.67 |
Profitability
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 9.03% | 3.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.59% | 1.17% |
| Return on Equity | 8.04% | 3.66% |
| Return on Assets | 2.56% | 0.66% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.54 | 13.34 |
Growth
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.60% | -23.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -11.70% | -31.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 462.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.18 | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | — | -0.16 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | — | 1.94 |
| Calmar (Composite) | — | 1.29 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.6665 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #23,608 |
Ownership
| Metric | CRBJF | SOBHA |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 59.55% | 5847.30% |
| % Institutions | 17.75% | 2805.40% |
Compare CRBJF to peers
Compare SOBHA to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.