CRBJF vs DAR: China Resources Land Ltd vs Dar Global Plc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CR
CRBJF•United States
$3.80
+0.00%
DA
DAR•London Stock Exchange
$7.48
+0.00%
$136.82B
Quick Summary
Dar Global Plc is 4.8× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. DAR trades at a lower P/E than CRBJF. CRBJF pays a dividend; DAR does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $3.80 | $7.48 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 43.47% |
| 52-Week High | $3.98 | $10.33 |
| 52-Week Low | $3.80 | $5.21 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $7.10 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $7.42 |
| Beta | — | -0.21 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.38B | $136.82B |
| Enterprise Value | $374.32B | $1.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $281.44B | $538.62M |
| Shares Outstanding | 7.13B | 180.02M |
| Float | 2.89B | 21.62M |
| Employees | — | 375 |
Valuation
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 7.37 | 0.14 |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.90 |
| Price / Sales | 0.10 | 2.54 |
| Price / Book | 0.68 | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.09 | 10.16 |
Profitability
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 9.03% | 18.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.59% | 22.00% |
| Return on Equity | 8.04% | 18.97% |
| Return on Assets | 2.56% | 3.44% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.54 | 0.56 |
Growth
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.60% | 95.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -11.70% | 219.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 462.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.18 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | — | 5.89 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | — | 7.87 |
| Calmar (Composite) | — | 14.68 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.5991 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,287 |
Ownership
| Metric | CRBJF | DAR |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 59.55% | 8798.90% |
| % Institutions | 17.75% | 0.00% |
Compare CRBJF to peers
Compare DAR to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.