Home CRBJF vs CTPVF CRBJF vs CTPVF: China Resources Land Ltd vs CTP N.V Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
Quick Summary China Resources Land Ltd is 2.7× the market cap of CTP N.V. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than CTPVF. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric CRBJF CTPVF Current Price $3.80 $16.33 Daily Change 0.00% 0.00% 1-Year Return — 8.91% 52-Week High $3.98 $22.71 52-Week Low $3.80 $14.99 50-Day MA — $22.44 200-Day MA — $20.55 Beta — 0.84
Size & Revenue Metric CRBJF CTPVF Market Cap $28.38B $10.39B Enterprise Value $374.32B $17.87B Revenue (TTM) $281.44B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 7.13B 479.28M Float 2.89B 130.34M Employees — 924
Valuation Metric CRBJF CTPVF Trailing P/E 7.37 7.37 Forward P/E — 19.46 Price / Sales 0.10 10.68 Price / Book 0.68 1.09 EV / EBITDA 8.09 8.69
Profitability Metric CRBJF CTPVF Profit Margin 9.03% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.59% 63.98% Return on Equity 8.04% 13.68% Return on Assets 2.56% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.54 2.94
Growth Metric CRBJF CTPVF Revenue Growth (YoY) -6.60% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -11.70% -38.30%
Dividends Metric CRBJF CTPVF Dividend Yield 462.00% 2.91% Dividend / Share 0.18 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric CRBJF CTPVF Sortino (Composite) — -0.56 Sharpe (Composite) — -0.64 Calmar (Composite) — -1.40 Hurst Exponent — 0.5379 Piotroski F-Score — 6/9 Magic Formula Rank — #21,621
Ownership Metric CRBJF CTPVF % Insiders 59.55% 7223.80% % Institutions 17.75% 1711.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.