Home CRBJF vs CTPNV CRBJF vs CTPNV: China Resources Land Ltd vs CTP N.V. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary China Resources Land Ltd is 3.6× the market cap of CTP N.V.. CTPNV trades at a lower P/E than CRBJF. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric CRBJF CTPNV Current Price $3.80 €16.66 Daily Change 0.00% 2.21% 1-Year Return — 2.08% 52-Week High $3.98 €19.60 52-Week Low $3.80 €14.14 50-Day MA — €16.94 200-Day MA — €17.92 Beta — 0.94
Size & Revenue Metric CRBJF CTPNV Market Cap $28.38B $7.79B Enterprise Value $374.32B $16.37B Revenue (TTM) $281.44B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 7.13B 485.04M Float 2.89B 129.31M Employees — 924
Valuation Metric CRBJF CTPNV Trailing P/E 7.37 7.11 Forward P/E — 16.13 PEG Ratio — 2.76 Price / Sales 0.10 8.01 Price / Book 0.68 0.92 EV / EBITDA 8.09 9.83
Profitability Metric CRBJF CTPNV Profit Margin 9.03% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.59% 63.98% Return on Equity 8.04% 13.68% Return on Assets 2.56% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.54 2.26
Growth Metric CRBJF CTPNV Revenue Growth (YoY) -6.60% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -11.70% -38.30%
Dividends Metric CRBJF CTPNV Dividend Yield 462.00% 3.99% Dividend / Share 0.18 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric CRBJF CTPNV Sortino (Composite) — 1.28 Sharpe (Composite) — 3.64 Calmar (Composite) — 3.86 Hurst Exponent — 0.5953 Piotroski F-Score — 4/9 Magic Formula Rank — #21,157
Ownership Metric CRBJF CTPNV % Insiders 59.55% 7330.30% % Institutions 17.75% 1701.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.