CQE vs RFF: Charter Hall Social Infrastructure REIT vs Rural Funds Group
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in Australia.
CQ
CQE•Australian Securities Exchange
A$2.67
+1.52%
RF
RFF•Australian Securities Exchange
A$2.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Charter Hall Social Infrastructure REIT is 1.3× the market cap of Rural Funds Group. CQE trades at a lower P/E than RFF. CQE offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | A$2.67 | A$2.00 |
| Daily Change | 1.52% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -6.32% | 15.61% |
| 52-Week High | A$3.45 | A$2.14 |
| 52-Week Low | A$2.54 | A$1.70 |
| 50-Day MA | A$2.74 | A$2.05 |
| 200-Day MA | A$3.06 | A$1.97 |
| Beta | 0.93 | 0.86 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $979.73M | $779.45M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.70B | $1.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $132.80M | $138.80M |
| Shares Outstanding | 371.11M | 389.72M |
| Float | 346.76M | 377.35M |
| Employees | 0 | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 11.00 | 11.76 |
| Forward P/E | 14.53 | 16.16 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.44 | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | 7.38 | 5.62 |
| Price / Book | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.98 | 14.65 |
Profitability
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 65.51% | 45.08% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 74.39% | 52.96% |
| Return on Equity | 6.05% | 5.75% |
| Return on Assets | 2.81% | 2.38% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.17 |
Growth
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.10% | 10.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 52.60% | 257.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.19% | 5.79% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.16 | 0.12 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.14 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.10 | -0.12 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.50 | 0.06 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5650 | 0.5168 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #19,650 | #23,197 |
Ownership
| Metric | CQE | RFF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1106.20% | 366.20% |
| % Institutions | 2883.50% | 2707.70% |
Compare CQE to peers
Compare RFF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.