COL vs GRWPF: Inmobiliaria Colonial SA vs Growthpoint Properties Australia
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CO
COL•Bolsa de Madrid
€5.59
+1.73%
GR
GRWPF•United States
$1.54
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Inmobiliaria Colonial SA is 2.8× the market cap of Growthpoint Properties Australia.
Price & Performance
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | €5.59 | $1.54 |
| Daily Change | 1.73% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -0.45% | — |
| 52-Week High | €6.29 | $1.54 |
| 52-Week Low | €4.91 | $1.54 |
| 50-Day MA | €5.25 | — |
| 200-Day MA | €5.46 | — |
| Beta | 1.25 | 0.93 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.28B | $1.16B |
| Enterprise Value | $8.27B | $3.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $425.03M | $332.90M |
| Shares Outstanding | 615.01M | 754.30M |
| Float | 268.61M | 263.45M |
| Employees | 226 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.51 | — |
| Forward P/E | 15.29 | — |
| Price / Sales | 7.71 | 3.49 |
| Price / Book | 0.56 | 0.73 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.46 | 13.87 |
Profitability
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 81.04% | 11.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 66.50% | 67.66% |
| Return on Equity | 5.75% | 1.54% |
| Return on Assets | 1.62% | 3.10% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.56 | -0.11 |
Growth
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -45.20% | 5.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -66.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 4.94 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.50 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.50 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5925 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #22,117 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | COL | GRWPF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2100.70% | 65.13% |
| % Institutions | 5935.10% | 8.65% |
Compare COL to peers
Compare GRWPF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.