Sign up for free insights newsletter

CMW vs GPEAF: Cromwell Property Group vs Great Portland Estates Plc

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

CM
CMWAustralian Securities Exchange
A$0.40
-2.44%
Australia
$1.03B
GP
GPEAFUnited States
$3.71
+0.00%
United States
$2.28B

Quick Summary

Great Portland Estates Plc is 2.2× the market cap of Cromwell Property Group. CMW trades at a lower P/E than GPEAF. GPEAF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

MetricCMWGPEAF
Current PriceA$0.40$3.71
Daily Change-2.44%0.00%
1-Year Return9.59%1.92%
52-Week HighA$0.50$5.23
52-Week LowA$0.34$3.71
50-Day MAA$0.41
200-Day MAA$0.44
Beta1.070.82

Size & Revenue

MetricCMWGPEAF
Market Cap$1.03B$2.28B
Enterprise Value$1.69B$2.62B
Revenue (TTM)$249.30M$114.00M
Shares Outstanding2.62B403.41M
Float2.11B351.63M
Employees0

Valuation

MetricCMWGPEAF
Trailing P/E9.8810.76
Forward P/E9.23
PEG Ratio16.98
Price / Sales4.1019.96
Price / Book0.670.78
EV / EBITDA11.1878.78

Profitability

MetricCMWGPEAF
Profit Margin42.24%127.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)73.93%33.07%
Return on Equity6.87%7.32%
Return on Assets3.96%0.67%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.040.49

Growth

MetricCMWGPEAF
Revenue Growth (YoY)70.70%24.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-20.10%98.30%

Dividends

MetricCMWGPEAF
Dividend Yield7.79%279.00%
Dividend / Share0.030.11

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

MetricCMWGPEAF
Sortino (Composite)0.62-1.96
Sharpe (Composite)0.19-1.96
Calmar (Composite)0.13-8.04
Hurst Exponent0.6504
Piotroski F-Score6/9
Magic Formula Rank#17,809

Ownership

MetricCMWGPEAF
% Insiders3941.80%1.23%
% Institutions1601.40%81.78%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.