CLNXF vs SWPFF: Cellnex Telecom S.A vs Swire Properties Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CL
CLNXF•United States
$34.01
-1.38%
SW
SWPFF•United States
$3.14
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Cellnex Telecom S.A is 1.3× the market cap of Swire Properties Limited. SWPFF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $34.01 | $3.14 |
| Daily Change | -1.38% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -8.08% | 56.75% |
| 52-Week High | $40.61 | $3.35 |
| 52-Week Low | $28.67 | $2.08 |
| 50-Day MA | $33.31 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $34.26 | — |
| Beta | 1.31 | 0.69 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.24B | $17.28B |
| Enterprise Value | $46.30B | $62.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.12B | $16.60B |
| Shares Outstanding | 673.55M | 5.76B |
| Float | 557.06M | 960.69M |
| Employees | 2,494 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 1428.57 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.40 | 1.04 |
| Price / Book | 1.59 | 0.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.45 | 6.92 |
Profitability
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -8.76% | -9.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.01% | 57.69% |
| Return on Equity | -2.46% | -0.56% |
| Return on Assets | 0.79% | 1.52% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.61 | -0.03 |
Growth
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 36.30% | 4.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -85.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 489.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.15 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 6.38 | 0.78 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.82 | 0.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 17.07 | -1.89 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7833 | 0.5795 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #26,486 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CLNXF | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.20% | 83.31% |
| % Institutions | 6785.60% | 6.53% |
Compare CLNXF to peers
Compare SWPFF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.