CDNIF vs QBBHY: Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista Holdings S.A vs Qube Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in United States.
CD
CDNIF•United States
$34.17
+0.00%
QB
QBBHY•United States
$11.50
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista Holdings S.A is 1.2× the market cap of Qube Holdings Limited. CDNIF trades at a lower P/E than QBBHY. CDNIF pays a dividend; QBBHY does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $34.17 | $11.50 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 17.38% | 0.00% |
| 52-Week High | $36.75 | $11.50 |
| 52-Week Low | $29.11 | $11.50 |
| Beta | 0.45 | 0.68 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.88B | $4.07B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.85B | $23.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.64B | $4.37B |
| Shares Outstanding | 132.12M | 354.08M |
| Float | 58.53M | 1.74B |
Valuation
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.18 | 26.74 |
| Price / Sales | 0.36 | 0.93 |
| Price / Book | 5.39 | 9.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.03 | 42.67 |
Profitability
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.02% | 3.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 2.53% | 9.88% |
| Return on Equity | 38.55% | 6.98% |
| Return on Assets | 2.53% | 2.69% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.41 | 0.43 |
Growth
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.30% | 10.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -7.80% | 101.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 692.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 2.37 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.44 | 0.53 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.69 | 0.30 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.02 | 0.55 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4732 | 0.5251 |
Ownership
| Metric | CDNIF | QBBHY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 55.34% | — |
| % Institutions | 18.82% | — |
Compare CDNIF to peers
Compare QBBHY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.