CATE vs TQ5: Catena AB vs Frasers Property
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CATE•Nasdaq Stockholm
SEK 479.40
+1.70%
TQ
TQ5•SGX
SGD 1.07
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Catena AB is 6.8× the market cap of Frasers Property. CATE pays a dividend; TQ5 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | SEK 479.40 | SGD 1.07 |
| Daily Change | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.80% | 43.45% |
| 52-Week High | SEK 499.60 | SGD 1.16 |
| 52-Week Low | SEK 417.80 | SGD 0.75 |
| 50-Day MA | SEK 460.78 | — |
| 200-Day MA | SEK 451.45 | — |
| Beta | 1.32 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $30.34B | $4.44B |
| Enterprise Value | $48.05B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.64B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 66.40M | — |
| Float | 52.94M | — |
| Employees | 73 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 16.78 | — |
| Forward P/E | 20.04 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 9.17 | — |
| Price / Sales | 11.48 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.27 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.17 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 62.18% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 79.06% | — |
| Return on Equity | 6.99% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.93% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 27.24 | — |
Growth
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 9.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 6.60% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.07% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 9.50 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.05 | 4.99 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 7.62 | 6.99 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5429 | 0.5862 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #19,193 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CATE | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2762.20% | — |
| % Institutions | 4713.80% | — |
Compare CATE to peers
Compare TQ5 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.