Sign up for free insights newsletter

CAST vs CRBJF: Castellum AB vs China Resources Land Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

Castellum AB
CASTNasdaq Stockholm
SEK 127.20
+0.99%
Sweden
$57.54B
CR
CRBJFUnited States
$3.80
+0.00%
United States
$28.38B

Quick Summary

Castellum AB is 2.0× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than CAST. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

MetricCASTCRBJF
Current PriceSEK 127.20$3.80
Daily Change0.99%0.00%
1-Year Return13.17%
52-Week HighSEK 127.20$3.98
52-Week LowSEK 102.75$3.80
50-Day MASEK 111.46
200-Day MASEK 109.32
Beta1.47

Size & Revenue

MetricCASTCRBJF
Market Cap$57.54B$28.38B
Enterprise Value$114.06B$374.32B
Revenue (TTM)$9.88B$281.44B
Shares Outstanding473.42M7.13B
Float341.73M2.89B
Employees521

Valuation

MetricCASTCRBJF
Trailing P/E63.647.37
Forward P/E9.81
PEG Ratio0.92
Price / Sales5.820.10
Price / Book0.720.68
EV / EBITDA31.678.09

Profitability

MetricCASTCRBJF
Profit Margin9.49%9.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)64.19%14.59%
Return on Equity1.19%8.04%
Return on Assets2.58%2.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.910.54

Growth

MetricCASTCRBJF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.40%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)82.30%-11.70%

Dividends

MetricCASTCRBJF
Dividend Yield0.00%462.00%
Dividend / Share0.000.18

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

MetricCASTCRBJF
Sortino (Composite)2.12
Sharpe (Composite)6.14
Calmar (Composite)2.77
Hurst Exponent0.6393
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#18,505

Ownership

MetricCASTCRBJF
% Insiders2939.40%59.55%
% Institutions4718.80%17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.