CAOVF vs HKHGF: China Overseas Land & Investment Limited vs Hongkong Land Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CA
CAOVF•United States
$1.58
+0.32%
HK
HKHGF•United States
$8.14
+0.00%
Quick Summary
China Overseas Land & Investment Limited is 1.2× the market cap of Hongkong Land Holdings Limited. CAOVF trades at a lower P/E than HKHGF. HKHGF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $1.58 | $8.14 |
| Daily Change | 0.32% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -10.48% | 87.13% |
| 52-Week High | $1.96 | $8.70 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.31 | $3.95 |
| 50-Day MA | $1.66 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $1.67 | — |
| Beta | 0.31 | 0.34 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.25B | $17.16B |
| Enterprise Value | $35.29B | $20.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $181.44B | $1.45B |
| Shares Outstanding | 10.94B | 2.15B |
| Float | 3.70B | 975.00M |
| Employees | 3,232 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 8.89 | 13.76 |
| Forward P/E | 5.90 | 25.74 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.40 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.12 | 11.85 |
| Price / Book | 0.33 | 0.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.08 | 64.49 |
Profitability
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 7.67% | 87.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.26% | 2.20% |
| Return on Equity | 3.86% | 4.16% |
| Return on Assets | 1.45% | 0.49% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.58 |
Growth
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.30% | -32.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -16.60% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 30.36% | 313.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.51 | 0.25 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.35 | 3.51 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.27 | 1.93 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.71 | 9.45 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5420 | 0.4962 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #11,984 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CAOVF | HKHGF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6615.40% | 55.04% |
| % Institutions | 1811.50% | 15.84% |
Compare CAOVF to peers
Compare HKHGF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.