ANNSF vs ENAV: Aena S.M.E. S.A vs ENAV S.p.A.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
ANNSF•United States
$31.44
+1.98%
EN
ENAV•MIL
€5.18
+1.77%
Quick Summary
Aena S.M.E. S.A is 18.2× the market cap of ENAV S.p.A.. ANNSF pays a dividend; ENAV does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $31.44 | €5.18 |
| Daily Change | 1.98% | 1.77% |
| 1-Year Return | -87.34% | 47.23% |
| 52-Week High | $275.92 | €5.61 |
| 52-Week Low | $25.08 | €3.55 |
| 50-Day MA | $30.91 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $28.66 | — |
| Beta | 0.84 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.89B | $2.63B |
| Enterprise Value | $50.23B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.30B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.50B | — |
| Float | 703.95M | — |
| Employees | 10,238 | 4,547 |
Valuation
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 18.90 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.15 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.13 | — |
| Price / Sales | 7.60 | — |
| Price / Book | 4.38 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.02 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 33.89% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 47.39% | — |
| Return on Equity | 24.76% | — |
| Return on Assets | 10.33% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.66 | — |
Growth
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 9.30% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 14.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.09% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.09 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.07 | 2.24 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.54 | 1.44 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.85 | 1.83 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6156 | 0.5890 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,852 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | ANNSF | ENAV |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5100.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 2452.60% | — |
Compare ANNSF to peers
Compare ENAV to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.