ACDSF vs GMT: Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust vs Goodman Property Trust (NS) Ord
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
AC
ACDSF•United States
$1.98
+0.00%
GM
NZ$1.91
-1.29%
Quick Summary
Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust is 3.8× the market cap of Goodman Property Trust (NS) Ord. ACDSF pays a dividend; GMT does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $1.98 | NZ$1.91 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -1.29% |
| 1-Year Return | 0.00% | 4.18% |
| 52-Week High | $2.28 | NZ$2.27 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.60 | NZ$1.79 |
| 50-Day MA | $2.09 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $2.08 | — |
| Beta | 0.50 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.28B | $2.98B |
| Enterprise Value | $15.24B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.61B | — |
| Float | 4.61B | — |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 15.62 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.30 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 164.83 | — |
| Price / Sales | 7.26 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.10 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.65 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 49.54% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 63.60% | — |
| Return on Equity | 7.37% | — |
| Return on Assets | 3.21% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.13 | — |
Growth
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.30% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 10.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.39% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.15 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.01 | -0.62 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.01 | -0.44 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.03 | -1.88 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.2954 | 0.5475 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,414 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | ACDSF | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 4996.90% | — |
Compare ACDSF to peers
Compare GMT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.