ABLZF vs PRY: ABB Ltd vs PRYSMIAN
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

ABLZF•United States
$95.00
+2.70%
PR
PRY•MIL
€121.65
+0.54%
Quick Summary
ABB Ltd is 5.7× the market cap of PRYSMIAN. ABLZF pays a dividend; PRY does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $95.00 | €121.65 |
| Daily Change | 2.70% | 0.54% |
| 1-Year Return | 81.99% | 175.79% |
| 52-Week High | $95.00 | €122.00 |
| 52-Week Low | $49.94 | €42.65 |
| 50-Day MA | $86.61 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $74.32 | — |
| Beta | 0.93 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $164.84B | $28.81B |
| Enterprise Value | $167.28B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.22B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.81B | — |
| Float | 1.82B | — |
| Employees | 111,900 | 33,952 |
Valuation
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 36.48 | — |
| Forward P/E | 29.41 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 3.03 | — |
| Price / Sales | 4.96 | — |
| Price / Book | 10.25 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.50 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 14.25% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.77% | — |
| Return on Equity | 29.39% | — |
| Return on Assets | 8.67% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.49 | — |
Growth
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.40% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 30.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.19 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.08 | 6.79 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.28 | 7.82 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 13.11 | 9.40 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5380 | 0.6128 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #12,113 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | ABLZF | PRY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 5707.20% | — |
Compare ABLZF to peers
Compare PRY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.