A17U vs ACDSF: CapLand Ascendas REIT vs Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
A1
A17U•SGX
SGD 2.58
-0.39%
AC
ACDSF•United States
$1.98
+0.00%
Quick Summary
CapLand Ascendas REIT is 1.2× the market cap of Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust. ACDSF pays a dividend; A17U does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | SGD 2.58 | $1.98 |
| Daily Change | -0.39% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 3.74% | 0.00% |
| 52-Week High | SGD 2.82 | $2.28 |
| 52-Week Low | SGD 2.44 | $1.60 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $2.09 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $2.08 |
| Beta | — | 0.50 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.14B | $11.28B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $15.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.55B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 4.61B |
| Float | — | 4.61B |
| Employees | — | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 15.62 |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.30 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 164.83 |
| Price / Sales | — | 7.26 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 17.65 |
Profitability
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 49.54% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 63.60% |
| Return on Equity | — | 7.37% |
| Return on Assets | — | 3.21% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.13 |
Growth
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 6.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 10.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 7.39% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.15 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.60 | 0.01 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.35 | 0.01 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.34 | -0.02 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5479 | 0.2980 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #16,415 |
Ownership
| Metric | A17U | ACDSF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3.10% |
| % Institutions | — | 4996.90% |
Compare A17U to peers
Compare ACDSF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.