Home 9699 vs QUB 9699 vs QUB: Hangzhou Sf Intra City Industrial Co Ltd vs QUBE Holdings Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
96
9699 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
QU
QUB • Australian Securities Exchange
Quick Summary Hangzhou Sf Intra City Industrial Co Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of QUBE Holdings Ltd. 9699 trades at a lower P/E than QUB. QUB pays a dividend; 9699 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 9699 QUB Current Price HK$11.28 A$5.01 Daily Change -1.05% 0.20% 1-Year Return 41.18% 29.12% 52-Week High HK$18.94 A$5.06 52-Week Low HK$7.89 A$3.79 50-Day MA HK$12.52 A$4.93 200-Day MA HK$13.37 A$4.55 Beta 1.64 0.64
Size & Revenue Metric 9699 QUB Market Cap $10.35B $8.85B Enterprise Value $7.33B $11.75B Revenue (TTM) $22.90B $4.37B Shares Outstanding 742.49M 1.77B Float 276.76M 1.74B Employees 2,067 10,000
Valuation Metric 9699 QUB Trailing P/E 33.29 41.67 Forward P/E 0.00 27.25 PEG Ratio — 6.50 Price / Sales 0.45 2.03 Price / Book 2.75 2.82 EV / EBITDA 20.70 14.38
Profitability Metric 9699 QUB Profit Margin 1.21% 3.62% Operating Margin (TTM) 1.25% 9.88% Return on Equity 8.90% 6.99% Return on Assets 3.43% 2.69% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.23 0.12
Growth Metric 9699 QUB Revenue Growth (YoY) 42.80% 10.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) 93.90% 100.70%
Dividends Metric 9699 QUB Dividend Yield — 2.23% Dividend / Share — 0.11
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 9699 QUB Sortino (Composite) -0.22 3.50 Sharpe (Composite) -0.22 1.62 Calmar (Composite) -1.82 5.16 Hurst Exponent 0.6246 0.6472 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #17,027 #25,490
Ownership Metric 9699 QUB % Insiders 6638.60% 730.10% % Institutions 414.30% 5948.90%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.