8802 vs HLDCY: Mitsubishi Estate Company,Limited vs Henderson Land Development
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
8802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,495.00
-3.93%
HL
HLDCY•United States
$3.86
+1.05%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Estate Company,Limited is 242.5× the market cap of Henderson Land Development. HLDCY pays a dividend; 8802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,495.00 | $3.86 |
| Daily Change | -3.93% | 1.05% |
| 1-Year Return | 80.62% | 46.77% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,308.00 | $4.52 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,439.51 | $2.59 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $4.02 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $3.63 |
| Beta | — | 1.09 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.70T | $19.40B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $27.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $23.05B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 4.84B |
| Float | — | 1.33B |
| Employees | — | 9,997 |
Valuation
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 24.25 |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.76 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.52 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.84 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.46 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 23.43 |
Profitability
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 26.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 22.64% |
| Return on Equity | — | 1.85% |
| Return on Assets | — | 0.44% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.16 |
Growth
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -18.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -8.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 46.39% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.80 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.89 | 1.33 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.76 | 0.87 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.53 | 2.32 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6056 | 0.5715 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #15,704 |
Ownership
| Metric | 8802 | HLDCY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.30% |
Compare 8802 to peers
Compare HLDCY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.