8802 vs CPNNF: Mitsubishi Estate Company,Limited vs Central Pattana Public Company Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
8802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,495.00
-3.93%
CP
CPNNF•United States
$1.56
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Estate Company,Limited is 671.8× the market cap of Central Pattana Public Company Limited. CPNNF pays a dividend; 8802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,495.00 | $1.56 |
| Daily Change | -3.93% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 80.62% | 4.00% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,308.00 | $1.56 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,439.51 | $1.50 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $1.56 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $1.53 |
| Beta | — | 0.60 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.70T | $7.00B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $12.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $54.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 0 |
| Float | — | 2.57B |
| Employees | — | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 12.00 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.67 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.47 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.13 |
| Price / Book | — | 2.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 10.22 |
Profitability
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 34.81% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 47.14% |
| Return on Equity | — | 16.74% |
| Return on Assets | — | 5.29% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.13 |
Growth
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 7.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 25.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.05% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 2.40 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.89 | 0.34 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.76 | 0.20 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.53 | 0.35 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6056 | 0.5099 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #7,693 |
Ownership
| Metric | 8802 | CPNNF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 449.00% |
Compare 8802 to peers
Compare CPNNF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.