8058 vs CTPCY: Mitsubishi Corporation vs Citic Ltd ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
80
8058•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,952.00
-2.63%
CTPCY•United States
$8.50
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Corporation is 376.5× the market cap of Citic Ltd ADR.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,952.00 | $8.50 |
| Daily Change | -2.63% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 102.27% | 48.16% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,712.00 | $8.50 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,396.95 | $5.75 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $7.76 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $7.42 |
| Beta | — | 0.91 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.85T | $39.45B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $248.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $964.02B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 5.82B |
| Float | — | 4.94B |
| Employees | — | 190,763 |
Valuation
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 4.77 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.04 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 9.69 |
Profitability
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 6.73% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 31.92% |
| Return on Equity | — | 8.50% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.63% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.42 |
Growth
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -2.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -23.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.31 | 1.67 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.97 | 1.15 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.45 | 2.48 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6014 | 0.6623 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,828 |
Ownership
| Metric | 8058 | CTPCY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.00% |
Compare 8058 to peers
Compare CTPCY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.