8002 vs LATO-B: Marubeni Corporation vs Investment AB Latour (publ)
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
8002•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,853.00
-3.10%
LA
LATO-B•Nasdaq Stockholm
SEK 240.80
+3.44%
Quick Summary
Marubeni Corporation is 59.3× the market cap of Investment AB Latour (publ). LATO-B pays a dividend; 8002 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥5,853.00 | SEK 240.80 |
| Daily Change | -3.10% | 3.44% |
| 1-Year Return | 160.09% | -7.63% |
| 52-Week High | ¥6,301.00 | SEK 272.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,253.82 | SEK 190.75 |
| 50-Day MA | — | SEK 212.51 |
| 200-Day MA | — | SEK 229.28 |
| Beta | — | 1.35 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.40T | $141.61B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $155.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $28.15B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 591.73M |
| Float | — | 19.60M |
| Employees | — | 10,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 28.84 |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.62 |
| Price / Sales | — | 5.03 |
| Price / Book | — | 3.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 21.74 |
Profitability
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 17.47% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 20.96% |
| Return on Equity | — | 11.41% |
| Return on Assets | — | 3.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 7.68 |
Growth
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 5.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 9.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.34% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 5.10 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 6.70 | 0.27 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.89 | 9.31 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 15.03 | 0.40 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6319 | 0.4956 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #20,673 |
Ownership
| Metric | 8002 | LATO-B |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7725.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 912.70% |
Compare 8002 to peers
Compare LATO-B to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.