7003 vs RYCEY: MITSUI E&S Co.,Ltd. vs Rolls Royce Holdings plc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
7003•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,644.00
-0.83%
RYCEY•United States
$18.00
+5.08%
Quick Summary
MITSUI E&S Co.,Ltd. is 4.8× the market cap of Rolls Royce Holdings plc. RYCEY pays a dividend; 7003 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥5,644.00 | $18.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.83% | 5.08% |
| 1-Year Return | 254.38% | 85.95% |
| 52-Week High | ¥8,129.00 | $18.62 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,543.78 | $9.60 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $16.98 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $15.49 |
| Beta | — | 1.23 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $688.31B | $142.85B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $139.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $21.21B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 8.33B |
| Float | — | 8.20B |
| Employees | — | 43,162 |
Valuation
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 18.44 |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.67 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.22 |
| Price / Sales | — | 6.74 |
| Price / Book | — | 39.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 12.75 |
Profitability
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 27.54% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 20.33% |
| Return on Equity | — | 62.35% |
| Return on Assets | — | 7.09% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.93 |
Growth
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 16.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 4.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.55% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.10 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.08 | 5.93 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.13 | 2.97 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.11 | 11.21 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6024 | 0.6833 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #10,779 |
Ownership
| Metric | 7003 | RYCEY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 111.90% |
Compare 7003 to peers
Compare RYCEY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.