Home 688779 vs PRYMY 688779 vs PRYMY: Hunan Changyuan Lico Co Ltd vs Prysmian SPA ADR Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Prysmian SPA ADR is 1.5× the market cap of Hunan Changyuan Lico Co Ltd. 688779 trades at a lower P/E than PRYMY. PRYMY pays a dividend; 688779 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 688779 PRYMY Current Price CN¥11.05 $71.79 Daily Change 1.19% 0.87% 1-Year Return 137.63% 178.90% 52-Week High CN¥12.45 $72.30 52-Week Low CN¥4.60 $25.02 50-Day MA CN¥10.82 — 200-Day MA CN¥8.14 — Beta 1.02 0.84
Size & Revenue Metric 688779 PRYMY Market Cap $21.07B $32.37B Enterprise Value $21.38B $19.32B Revenue (TTM) $9.34B $20.13B Shares Outstanding 1.93B 573.62M Float 1.07B 286.78M Employees 2,064 —
Valuation Metric 688779 PRYMY Trailing P/E 0.00 21.76 Forward P/E 0.00 — Price / Sales 2.26 1.61 Price / Book 3.00 2.13 EV / EBITDA 2185.34 8.17
Profitability Metric 688779 PRYMY Profit Margin 2.44% 6.31% Operating Margin (TTM) -1.23% 13.65% Return on Equity 3.24% 21.64% Return on Assets -0.73% 6.25% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.18 2.56
Growth Metric 688779 PRYMY Revenue Growth (YoY) 142.70% 13.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) 243.90% 61.00%
Dividends Metric 688779 PRYMY Dividend Yield — 82.00% Dividend / Share — 0.45
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 688779 PRYMY Sortino (Composite) 3.59 7.06 Sharpe (Composite) 2.24 12.97 Calmar (Composite) 6.56 12.39 Hurst Exponent 0.6537 0.6228 Piotroski F-Score 4/9 —
Ownership Metric 688779 PRYMY % Insiders 4542.80% 0.00% % Institutions 815.90% 0.03%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.