688779 vs BE: Hunan Changyuan Lico Co Ltd vs Bloom Energy Corp
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
68
688779•SHG
CN¥11.05
+1.19%
BE•United States
$207.86
-1.05%
Quick Summary
Bloom Energy Corp is 1.8× the market cap of Hunan Changyuan Lico Co Ltd. BE trades at a lower P/E than 688779.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥11.05 | $207.86 |
| Daily Change | 1.19% | -1.05% |
| 1-Year Return | 137.63% | 1122.71% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥12.45 | $219.03 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥4.60 | $16.32 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥10.82 | $151.60 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥8.14 | $90.43 |
| Beta | 1.02 | 3.18 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.07B | $37.38B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.38B | $38.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.34B | $1.33B |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.93B | 280.55M |
| Float | 1.07B | 264.24M |
| Employees | 2,064 | 2,214 |
Valuation
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 106.38 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 4.27 |
| Price / Sales | 2.26 | 18.47 |
| Price / Book | 3.00 | 54.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 2185.34 | 2127.37 |
Profitability
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.44% | -4.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -1.23% | 13.27% |
| Return on Equity | 3.24% | -12.65% |
| Return on Assets | -0.73% | 1.57% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.18 | -0.37 |
Growth
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 142.70% | 35.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 243.90% | -98.80% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.59 | 7.66 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.24 | 8.55 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 6.56 | 10.96 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6537 | 0.5360 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #27,957 |
Ownership
| Metric | 688779 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4542.80% | 615.30% |
| % Institutions | 815.90% | 8694.80% |
Compare 688779 to peers
Compare BE to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.