Home 688303 vs ACLIF 688303 vs ACLIF: Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co Ltd vs ABB Turbo Systems AG Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co Ltd is 5.8× the market cap of ABB Turbo Systems AG. 688303 trades at a lower P/E than ACLIF. ACLIF pays a dividend; 688303 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 688303 ACLIF Current Price CN¥22.24 $106.05 Daily Change -1.55% 15.65% 1-Year Return 20.61% 130.54% 52-Week High CN¥34.39 $106.05 52-Week Low CN¥17.78 $46.00 50-Day MA CN¥22.76 $77.00 200-Day MA CN¥26.64 $78.83 Beta 0.54 0.31
Size & Revenue Metric 688303 ACLIF Market Cap $47.65B $8.28B Enterprise Value $43.74B $9.21B Revenue (TTM) $4.84B $1.13B Shares Outstanding 2.15B 93.90M Float 517.01M 93.85M Employees 4,740 2,749
Valuation Metric 688303 ACLIF Trailing P/E 0.00 37.02 Forward P/E 0.00 21.28 Price / Sales 9.85 7.36 Price / Book 1.24 21.04 EV / EBITDA 7.84 30.30
Profitability Metric 688303 ACLIF Profit Margin -23.34% 17.34% Operating Margin (TTM) -47.30% 25.42% Return on Equity -2.85% 63.08% Return on Assets -3.60% 13.18% Diluted EPS (TTM) -1.26 2.08
Growth Metric 688303 ACLIF Revenue Growth (YoY) 13.50% 20.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -89.00% 29.80%
Dividends Metric 688303 ACLIF Dividend Yield — 1.79% Dividend / Share — 1.38
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 688303 ACLIF Sortino (Composite) -0.35 11.26 Sharpe (Composite) -0.27 9.31 Calmar (Composite) -1.22 11.13 Hurst Exponent 0.5104 0.5568 Piotroski F-Score 2/9 9/9 Magic Formula Rank — #12,426
Ownership Metric 688303 ACLIF % Insiders 7499.30% 5.80% % Institutions 654.80% 4527.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.