688017 vs 7011: Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd vs Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
68
688017•SHG
CN¥213.00
+2.41%
7011•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,371.00
-4.38%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd. is 401.9× the market cap of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥213.00 | ¥4,371.00 |
| Daily Change | 2.41% | -4.38% |
| 1-Year Return | 59.63% | 66.40% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥242.38 | ¥5,195.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥115.12 | ¥2,520.64 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥210.95 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥174.68 | — |
| Beta | 0.74 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $38.04B | $15.29T |
| Enterprise Value | $36.47B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $568.95M | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 183.33M | — |
| Float | 117.62M | — |
| Employees | 823 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 415.04 | — |
| Forward P/E | 71.43 | — |
| Price / Sales | 66.87 | — |
| Price / Book | 10.87 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 343.93 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.96% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 36.87% | — |
| Return on Equity | 3.60% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.19% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.50 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 45.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 66.80% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.80 | 0.35 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.79 | 0.11 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.11 | -0.42 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5863 | 0.5555 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #28,106 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 688017 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3773.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 1693.30% | — |
Compare 688017 to peers
Compare 7011 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.