6845 vs ETN: Azbil Corporation vs Eaton Corporation PLC
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
6845•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,488.00
+1.26%
ETN•United States
$406.21
+3.43%
Quick Summary
Azbil Corporation is 4.4× the market cap of Eaton Corporation PLC. ETN pays a dividend; 6845 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,488.00 | $406.21 |
| Daily Change | 1.26% | 3.43% |
| 1-Year Return | 27.97% | 51.39% |
| 52-Week High | ¥1,522.50 | $406.21 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,150.41 | $259.47 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $367.50 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $358.58 |
| Beta | — | 1.16 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $683.06B | $156.53B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $166.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $23.20B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 387.99M |
| Float | — | 387.25M |
| Employees | — | 97,303 |
Valuation
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 38.60 |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.30 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.99 |
| Price / Sales | — | 5.70 |
| Price / Book | — | 8.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 26.88 |
Profitability
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 14.89% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 19.97% |
| Return on Equity | — | 21.53% |
| Return on Assets | — | 8.33% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 8.06 |
Growth
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 13.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 18.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.04% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.16 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 4.63 | 4.90 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.57 | 2.79 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 8.71 | 14.93 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4716 | 0.6005 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,500 |
Ownership
| Metric | 6845 | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6.50% |
| % Institutions | — | 8541.20% |
Compare 6845 to peers
Compare ETN to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.