6465 vs ACLIF: HOSHIZAKI CORPORATION vs ABB Turbo Systems AG
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
64
6465•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,303.00
-2.21%
ACLIF•United States
$106.05
+15.65%
Quick Summary
HOSHIZAKI CORPORATION is 87.0× the market cap of ABB Turbo Systems AG. ACLIF pays a dividend; 6465 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥5,303.00 | $106.05 |
| Daily Change | -2.21% | 15.65% |
| 1-Year Return | -14.53% | 130.54% |
| 52-Week High | ¥6,236.88 | $106.05 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,841.45 | $46.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $77.00 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $78.83 |
| Beta | — | 0.31 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $720.59B | $8.28B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $9.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.13B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 93.90M |
| Float | — | 93.85M |
| Employees | — | 2,749 |
Valuation
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 37.02 |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.28 |
| Price / Sales | — | 7.36 |
| Price / Book | — | 21.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 30.30 |
Profitability
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 17.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 25.42% |
| Return on Equity | — | 63.08% |
| Return on Assets | — | 13.18% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 2.08 |
Growth
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 20.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 29.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.79% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.38 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.53 | 11.26 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.81 | 9.31 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.89 | 11.13 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5698 | 0.5568 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 9/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #12,426 |
Ownership
| Metric | 6465 | ACLIF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 4527.60% |
Compare 6465 to peers
Compare ACLIF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.