6383 vs FLS: DAIFUKU CO.,LTD. vs FLSmidth & Co.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
6383•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,370.00
-1.65%
FLS•Nasdaq Copenhagen
DKK 542.00
+3.83%
Quick Summary
DAIFUKU CO.,LTD. is 69.5× the market cap of FLSmidth & Co.. FLS pays a dividend; 6383 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥6,370.00 | DKK 542.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.65% | 3.83% |
| 1-Year Return | 83.53% | 84.73% |
| 52-Week High | ¥6,578.00 | DKK 611.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥3,414.78 | DKK 291.20 |
| 50-Day MA | — | DKK 533.07 |
| 200-Day MA | — | DKK 464.02 |
| Beta | — | 1.37 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.99T | $28.57B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $30.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $14.61B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 54.21M |
| Float | — | 45.87M |
| Employees | — | 5,296 |
Valuation
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 42.92 |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.79 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.29 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.96 |
| Price / Book | — | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 11.87 |
Profitability
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 0.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 12.45% |
| Return on Equity | — | 6.71% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 12.28 |
Growth
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -3.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 38.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.75% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.49 | 11.18 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.89 | 3.69 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 11.87 | 2.06 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5674 | 0.7523 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,971 |
Ownership
| Metric | 6383 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 1529.70% |
| % Institutions | — | 3521.70% |
Compare 6383 to peers
Compare FLS to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.