6383 vs 688017: DAIFUKU CO.,LTD. vs Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
6383•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,370.00
-1.65%
68
688017•SHG
CN¥213.00
+2.41%
Quick Summary
DAIFUKU CO.,LTD. is 52.2× the market cap of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥6,370.00 | CN¥213.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.65% | 2.41% |
| 1-Year Return | 83.53% | 59.63% |
| 52-Week High | ¥6,578.00 | CN¥242.38 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥3,414.78 | CN¥115.12 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥210.95 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥174.68 |
| Beta | — | 0.74 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.99T | $38.04B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $36.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $568.95M |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 183.33M |
| Float | — | 117.62M |
| Employees | — | 823 |
Valuation
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 415.04 |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.43 |
| Price / Sales | — | 66.87 |
| Price / Book | — | 10.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 343.93 |
Profitability
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 21.96% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 36.87% |
| Return on Equity | — | 3.60% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.19% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.50 |
Growth
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 45.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 66.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.49 | 3.80 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.89 | 5.79 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 11.87 | 9.11 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5674 | 0.5863 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #28,106 |
Ownership
| Metric | 6383 | 688017 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3773.90% |
| % Institutions | — | 1693.30% |
Compare 6383 to peers
Compare 688017 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.