6268 vs SU: Nabtesco Corporation vs Schneider Electric S.E.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
6268•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,677.00
-1.74%
SU•Euronext Paris
€278.65
+4.07%
Quick Summary
Nabtesco Corporation is 3.0× the market cap of Schneider Electric S.E.. SU pays a dividend; 6268 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,677.00 | €278.65 |
| Daily Change | -1.74% | 4.07% |
| 1-Year Return | 133.02% | 35.73% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,083.00 | €278.65 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,965.73 | €199.60 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €253.30 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €238.44 |
| Beta | — | 1.09 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $472.81B | $156.58B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $169.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $40.15B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 561.90M |
| Float | — | 562.22M |
| Employees | — | 156,399 |
Valuation
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 34.96 |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.74 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.04 |
| Price / Sales | — | 3.90 |
| Price / Book | — | 6.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 20.28 |
Profitability
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 17.63% |
| Return on Equity | — | 15.61% |
| Return on Assets | — | 6.78% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 7.97 |
Growth
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 4.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -6.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.57% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.20 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 4.81 | 3.81 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.67 | 2.02 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.25 | 8.01 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6184 | 0.6190 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #12,314 |
Ownership
| Metric | 6268 | SU |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 347.90% |
| % Institutions | — | 5101.50% |
Compare 6268 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.