603967 vs MFT: China Master Logistics Co Ltd vs Mainfreight Limited Ordinary Sh
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
603967•SHG
CN¥13.05
+0.08%
MF
NZ$57.72
+0.91%
Quick Summary
Mainfreight Limited Ordinary Sh is 1.5× the market cap of China Master Logistics Co Ltd. 603967 pays a dividend; MFT does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥13.05 | NZ$57.72 |
| Daily Change | 0.08% | 0.91% |
| 1-Year Return | 5.07% | 2.68% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥14.12 | NZ$69.57 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥10.73 | NZ$53.31 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥12.97 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥12.10 | — |
| Beta | 0.41 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.47B | $6.76B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.39B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.29B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 346.67M | — |
| Float | 107.58M | — |
| Employees | 1,436 | 11,130 |
Valuation
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 17.19 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.48 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.93 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.78 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.79% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.04% | — |
| Return on Equity | 12.70% | — |
| Return on Assets | 6.04% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.75 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -36.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -5.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.62% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.60 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.53 | -0.83 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.77 | -0.64 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.11 | -1.91 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5773 | 0.5348 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,900 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 603967 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6896.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 177.40% | — |
Compare 603967 to peers
Compare MFT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.