603899 vs 7962: Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc vs KING JIM CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
603899•SHG
CN¥25.37
-1.48%
7962•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥821.00
-0.48%
Quick Summary
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc and KING JIM CO.,LTD. are similar in size. 603899 pays a dividend; 7962 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥25.37 | ¥821.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.48% | -0.48% |
| 1-Year Return | -15.46% | -3.42% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥35.07 | ¥876.60 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥24.54 | ¥806.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥26.16 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥28.12 | — |
| Beta | 0.66 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.48B | $22.87B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.33B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.06B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 920.97M | — |
| Float | 328.92M | — |
| Employees | 5,549 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 17.83 | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.10 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.94 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.55 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.26 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 5.23% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.71% | — |
| Return on Equity | 14.10% | — |
| Return on Assets | 5.32% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.43 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.70% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -3.80% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.87 | 0.08 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.66 | -0.01 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.48 | -0.58 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5715 | 0.5416 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 3/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,213 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 603899 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6427.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 1394.40% | — |
Compare 603899 to peers
Compare 7962 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.