Home 603890 vs VIO 603890 vs VIO: Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A vs Viohalco S.A Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A is 2.3× the market cap of Viohalco S.A. VIO trades at a lower P/E than 603890. VIO offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603890 VIO Current Price CN¥18.92 €14.80 Daily Change 0.16% 3.93% 1-Year Return 86.96% 180.30% 52-Week High CN¥18.92 €15.96 52-Week Low CN¥10.32 €5.36 50-Day MA CN¥14.88 €13.49 200-Day MA CN¥14.59 €9.94 Beta 0.38 1.00
Size & Revenue Metric 603890 VIO Market Cap $8.43B $3.67B Enterprise Value $8.54B $5.75B Revenue (TTM) $4.16B $7.23B Shares Outstanding 446.81M 259.19M Float 270.06M 41.61M Employees 5,993 11,454
Valuation Metric 603890 VIO Trailing P/E 27.35 15.56 Forward P/E 0.00 0.00 PEG Ratio — 0.00 Price / Sales 2.03 0.51 Price / Book 2.71 1.75 EV / EBITDA 21.39 7.33
Profitability Metric 603890 VIO Profit Margin 7.25% 3.26% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.63% 8.84% Return on Equity 9.61% 12.42% Return on Assets 3.03% 4.88% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.69 0.91
Growth Metric 603890 VIO Revenue Growth (YoY) 15.00% 11.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) 23.40% 57.20%
Dividends Metric 603890 VIO Dividend Yield 0.79% 1.89% Dividend / Share 0.15 0.27
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603890 VIO Sortino (Composite) 3.95 6.11 Sharpe (Composite) 14.37 7.54 Calmar (Composite) 4.72 11.53 Hurst Exponent 0.5281 0.5464 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,408 #8,683
Ownership Metric 603890 VIO % Insiders 3884.60% 8395.00% % Institutions 57.30% 282.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.