Sign up for free insights newsletter

603890 vs ESAB: Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A vs ESAB Corp

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

ES
ESABUnited States
$109.55
+10.73%
United States
$6.07B

Quick Summary

Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A is 1.4× the market cap of ESAB Corp. ESAB trades at a lower P/E than 603890. 603890 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric603890ESAB
Current PriceCN¥18.92$109.55
Daily Change0.16%10.73%
1-Year Return86.96%-3.38%
52-Week HighCN¥18.92$134.82
52-Week LowCN¥10.32$91.58
50-Day MACN¥14.88$120.62
200-Day MACN¥14.59$118.36
Beta0.381.20

Size & Revenue

Metric603890ESAB
Market Cap$8.43B$6.07B
Enterprise Value$8.54B$8.15B
Revenue (TTM)$4.16B$2.77B
Shares Outstanding446.81M60.73M
Float270.06M56.78M
Employees5,99310,300

Valuation

Metric603890ESAB
Trailing P/E27.3523.89
Forward P/E0.0016.78
PEG Ratio1.03
Price / Sales2.032.14
Price / Book2.712.75
EV / EBITDA21.3914.32

Profitability

Metric603890ESAB
Profit Margin7.25%7.98%
Operating Margin (TTM)14.63%16.80%
Return on Equity9.61%12.89%
Return on Assets3.03%6.63%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.693.40

Growth

Metric603890ESAB
Revenue Growth (YoY)15.00%7.50%
Earnings Growth (YoY)23.40%-31.60%

Dividends

Metric603890ESAB
Dividend Yield0.79%0.37%
Dividend / Share0.150.38

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric603890ESAB
Sortino (Composite)3.951.81
Sharpe (Composite)14.372.83
Calmar (Composite)4.729.78
Hurst Exponent0.52810.6557
Piotroski F-Score7/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#21,408#11,756

Ownership

Metric603890ESAB
% Insiders3884.60%641.70%
% Institutions57.30%9811.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.