Home 603890 vs CMPO 603890 vs CMPO: Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A vs CompoSecure, Inc. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A is 1.2× the market cap of CompoSecure, Inc.. CMPO trades at a lower P/E than 603890. 603890 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603890 CMPO Current Price CN¥18.92 $16.51 Daily Change 0.16% -5.93% 1-Year Return 86.96% 55.02% 52-Week High CN¥18.92 $26.00 52-Week Low CN¥10.32 $10.35 50-Day MA CN¥14.88 $21.13 200-Day MA CN¥14.59 $17.80 Beta 0.38 1.01
Size & Revenue Metric 603890 CMPO Market Cap $8.43B $7.28B Enterprise Value $8.54B $4.65B Revenue (TTM) $4.16B $160.68M Shares Outstanding 446.81M 289.42M Float 270.06M 99.01M Employees 5,993 1,000
Valuation Metric 603890 CMPO Trailing P/E 27.35 0.00 Forward P/E 0.00 20.16 Price / Sales 2.03 45.30 Price / Book 2.71 31.34 EV / EBITDA 21.39 8.83
Profitability Metric 603890 CMPO Profit Margin 7.25% -134.84% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.63% 5.63% Return on Equity 9.61% 0.00% Return on Assets 3.03% 1.20% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.69 -2.34
Growth Metric 603890 CMPO Revenue Growth (YoY) 15.00% -42.50% Earnings Growth (YoY) 23.40% -60.30%
Dividends Metric 603890 CMPO Dividend Yield 0.79% 0.00% Dividend / Share 0.15 0.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603890 CMPO Sortino (Composite) 3.95 0.73 Sharpe (Composite) 14.37 0.42 Calmar (Composite) 4.72 0.52 Hurst Exponent 0.5281 0.6166 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,408 #13,240
Ownership Metric 603890 CMPO % Insiders 3884.60% 2069.10% % Institutions 57.30% 4087.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.