Sign up for free insights newsletter

603890 vs BEKB: Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A vs NV Bekaert SA

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

BE
BEKBBR
€42.40
+2.54%
Belgium
$2.06B

Quick Summary

Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology Co Ltd Class A is 4.1× the market cap of NV Bekaert SA. 603890 trades at a lower P/E than BEKB. BEKB offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric603890BEKB
Current PriceCN¥18.92€42.40
Daily Change0.16%2.54%
1-Year Return86.96%30.66%
52-Week HighCN¥18.92€44.70
52-Week LowCN¥10.32€31.45
50-Day MACN¥14.88€41.66
200-Day MACN¥14.59€38.60
Beta0.381.19

Size & Revenue

Metric603890BEKB
Market Cap$8.43B$2.06B
Enterprise Value$8.54B$2.25B
Revenue (TTM)$4.16B$3.71B
Shares Outstanding446.81M48.96M
Float270.06M29.86M
Employees5,99319,000

Valuation

Metric603890BEKB
Trailing P/E27.3531.69
Forward P/E0.009.12
PEG Ratio0.37
Price / Sales2.030.56
Price / Book2.711.00
EV / EBITDA21.397.73

Profitability

Metric603890BEKB
Profit Margin7.25%1.82%
Operating Margin (TTM)14.63%6.95%
Return on Equity9.61%2.94%
Return on Assets3.03%4.70%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.691.33

Growth

Metric603890BEKB
Revenue Growth (YoY)15.00%-7.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)23.40%-43.00%

Dividends

Metric603890BEKB
Dividend Yield0.79%4.72%
Dividend / Share0.151.95

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric603890BEKB
Sortino (Composite)3.954.08
Sharpe (Composite)10.632.02
Calmar (Composite)4.726.56
Hurst Exponent0.52810.5801
Piotroski F-Score7/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#21,388#15,384

Ownership

Metric603890BEKB
% Insiders3884.60%3872.90%
% Institutions57.30%2290.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.