603699 vs 7011: Neway Valve suzhou Co Ltd vs Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
603699•SHG
CN¥51.20
-1.61%
7011•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,371.00
-4.38%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd. is 390.9× the market cap of Neway Valve suzhou Co Ltd. 603699 pays a dividend; 7011 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥51.20 | ¥4,371.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.61% | -4.38% |
| 1-Year Return | 115.22% | 66.40% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥62.07 | ¥5,195.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥24.43 | ¥2,520.64 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥54.17 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥46.58 | — |
| Beta | 1.13 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.11B | $15.29T |
| Enterprise Value | $38.98B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.39B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 775.28M | — |
| Float | 365.53M | — |
| Employees | 4,053 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 26.98 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.30 | — |
| Price / Book | 9.66 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.93 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 19.52% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 27.08% | — |
| Return on Equity | 35.07% | — |
| Return on Assets | 11.81% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.87 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 36.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 34.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.72 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.82 | 0.35 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.60 | 0.11 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.89 | -0.42 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6780 | 0.5555 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #10,675 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 603699 | 7011 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6244.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 1887.80% | — |
Compare 603699 to peers
Compare 7011 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.