Home 603588 vs UWS 603588 vs UWS: Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering vs Waste Management Inc. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Waste Management Inc. is 3.1× the market cap of Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering. 603588 trades at a lower P/E than UWS. UWS offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603588 UWS Current Price CN¥15.69 €189.35 Daily Change -0.06% -1.69% 1-Year Return 200.00% -6.86% 52-Week High CN¥18.45 €212.80 52-Week Low CN¥5.31 €170.22 50-Day MA CN¥13.48 €200.03 200-Day MA CN¥8.91 €191.10 Beta 0.87 0.55
Size & Revenue Metric 603588 UWS Market Cap $24.86B $76.29B Enterprise Value $34.31B $95.87B Revenue (TTM) $14.73B $25.20B Shares Outstanding 1.52B 402.91M Float 1.04B 402.18M Employees 4,834 60,500
Valuation Metric 603588 UWS Trailing P/E 20.40 33.34 Forward P/E 0.00 27.03 PEG Ratio — 2.27 Price / Sales 1.69 3.03 Price / Book 2.33 9.00 EV / EBITDA 16.31 15.68
Profitability Metric 603588 UWS Profit Margin 5.69% 10.74% Operating Margin (TTM) 11.05% 20.04% Return on Equity 10.11% 29.70% Return on Assets 3.79% 6.49% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.80 5.68
Growth Metric 603588 UWS Revenue Growth (YoY) 50.00% 7.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) -2.60% 23.60%
Dividends Metric 603588 UWS Dividend Yield 0.64% 1.71% Dividend / Share 0.10 3.30
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603588 UWS Sortino (Composite) 10.74 -0.14 Sharpe (Composite) 6.20 -0.17 Calmar (Composite) 19.59 -1.57 Hurst Exponent 0.5980 0.5343 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,539 #13,528
Ownership Metric 603588 UWS % Insiders 3206.90% 25.20% % Institutions 541.10% 8398.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.