Home 603588 vs UMI 603588 vs UMI: Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering vs Umicore S.A. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering is 5.9× the market cap of Umicore S.A.. UMI trades at a lower P/E than 603588. UMI offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603588 UMI Current Price CN¥15.69 €18.07 Daily Change -0.06% 3.61% 1-Year Return 200.00% 135.13% 52-Week High CN¥18.45 €21.48 52-Week Low CN¥5.31 €7.96 50-Day MA CN¥13.48 €17.59 200-Day MA CN¥8.91 €16.30 Beta 0.87 0.80
Size & Revenue Metric 603588 UMI Market Cap $24.86B $4.22B Enterprise Value $34.31B $5.52B Revenue (TTM) $14.73B $19.39B Shares Outstanding 1.52B 240.56M Float 1.04B 215.91M Employees 4,834 10,963
Valuation Metric 603588 UMI Trailing P/E 20.40 11.04 Forward P/E 0.00 15.13 PEG Ratio — 2.62 Price / Sales 1.69 0.22 Price / Book 2.33 1.89 EV / EBITDA 16.31 4.71
Profitability Metric 603588 UMI Profit Margin 5.69% 1.98% Operating Margin (TTM) 11.05% 6.82% Return on Equity 10.11% 18.58% Return on Assets 3.79% 6.84% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.80 1.59
Growth Metric 603588 UMI Revenue Growth (YoY) 50.00% 44.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) -2.60% -38.30%
Dividends Metric 603588 UMI Dividend Yield 0.64% 2.87% Dividend / Share 0.10 0.50
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603588 UMI Sortino (Composite) 10.74 6.44 Sharpe (Composite) 6.20 2.08 Calmar (Composite) 19.59 5.70 Hurst Exponent 0.5980 0.6304 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,539 #3,981
Ownership Metric 603588 UMI % Insiders 3206.90% 500.00% % Institutions 541.10% 5066.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.