Home 603588 vs TOM 603588 vs TOM: Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering vs Tomra Systems ASA Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Tomra Systems ASA is 1.5× the market cap of Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering. 603588 trades at a lower P/E than TOM. 603588 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603588 TOM Current Price CN¥15.69 NOK 123.60 Daily Change -0.06% 1.15% 1-Year Return 200.00% -17.87% 52-Week High CN¥18.45 NOK 169.40 52-Week Low CN¥5.31 NOK 110.00 50-Day MA CN¥13.48 NOK 118.18 200-Day MA CN¥8.91 NOK 134.49 Beta 0.87 1.30
Size & Revenue Metric 603588 TOM Market Cap $24.86B $36.10B Enterprise Value $34.31B $42.41B Revenue (TTM) $14.73B $1.32B Shares Outstanding 1.52B 295.40M Float 1.04B 217.26M Employees 4,834 5,421
Valuation Metric 603588 TOM Trailing P/E 20.40 35.32 Forward P/E 0.00 22.12 PEG Ratio — 1.70 Price / Sales 1.69 27.38 Price / Book 2.33 5.48 EV / EBITDA 16.31 13.95
Profitability Metric 603588 TOM Profit Margin 5.69% 7.05% Operating Margin (TTM) 11.05% 17.05% Return on Equity 10.11% 15.67% Return on Assets 3.79% 5.38% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.80 3.46
Growth Metric 603588 TOM Revenue Growth (YoY) 50.00% -4.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) -2.60% -16.20%
Dividends Metric 603588 TOM Dividend Yield 0.64% 0.15% Dividend / Share 0.10 0.18
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603588 TOM Sortino (Composite) 10.18 3.82 Sharpe (Composite) 5.86 1.85 Calmar (Composite) 18.17 10.45 Hurst Exponent 0.5980 0.5248 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,529 #21,198
Ownership Metric 603588 TOM % Insiders 3206.90% 10.00% % Institutions 541.10% 8883.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.